|
Post by psalmchapter51 on Sept 13, 2012 13:10:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mglassma on Sept 13, 2012 13:13:28 GMT -5
If it has a camera it infringes. PERIOD.
|
|
|
Post by razmataz2003 on Sept 13, 2012 13:19:32 GMT -5
the limitation to the point and shoot be it on a phone or in a .50c plastic box is lack of fstop control, ISO limitations, lack of cmos or ccd resolution (size of the img capture chip) vs 35mm capture size and resolution.
BUT
for the average user a cell phone camera is fine for everyday facebook uploading...
imho its a joke... A full frame cmos chip can equal or exceed (35mm) resolution and color quality, those are in DSLRs not point and shit cameras...
iphone bullsh*t! I would still rather have a DSLR!
|
|
kott16
Junior Member
Posts: 242
|
Post by kott16 on Sept 13, 2012 14:10:05 GMT -5
Point and shoot = snapshot = disposable Digital/Film SLR = photograph = timeless
Generally speaking.
It all depends on the level of skill and the scene being captured. Sometimes you get lucky and get a great shot with a phone camera or point and shoot. If given a choice it is always better to have an SLR. Most people want their 15 minutes of FB fame, and so camera phones fit their needs and abilities.
Unlike the hack writers who largely write disposable articles, film still has its attributes. It will be interesting to see how Kodak's present situation with Fuji plays out. In a small market they could carve up the terrain nicely between still and motion film.
|
|
|
Post by daker55 on Sept 13, 2012 14:23:26 GMT -5
Don't forget Kotter...Fuji will soon be announcing their exit from the movie film business, leaving Kodak to pick up their customers...
|
|