Post by justice4kodak on Jan 18, 2014 16:11:47 GMT -5
America is a country with freedom in speech, truthfully a little bit better than the dictatorship at China, but still same shit!!!!? Does the powerful dirty crooks really listen to the victim of liars, investors of trust, specially EK share holders in this case?
Does judge Rubber really listen to the countless voices from the robbery victims?
Does judge Rubber really care about the request for EC and/or pay good attention to find out the truth?!!?
Options for old shares expired yesterday. The link on Yahoo for the old share's options has now been removed... Yahoo seems to still be keeping old ticker up and removing items like the options as they expire...
Anyone know when this below case might be heard by the US supreme court
12-786 LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC. V. AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES DECISION BELOW: 692 F.3d 1301 JUSTICE ALITO TOOK NO PART. CERT. GRANTED 1/10/2014 QUESTION PRESENTED: Akamai holds a patent claiming a method involving redirecting requests for Internet content and selecting optimal servers. The Federal Circuit acknowledged that neither Limelight nor customers using Limelight's service directly infringe Akamai's patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) because no one performs all the steps of the patented method. App. 6a, 30a. The Federal Circuit nevertheless held that Limelight could be liable, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), for inducing infringement if (1) it knew of Akamai's patent; (2) it performed all but one of the steps of the method; (3) it induced its customers to perform the final step of the claimed method; and (4) the customers performed that step. App. 30a. The question presented is: Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that a defendant may be held liable for inducing patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) even though no one has committed direct infringement under § 271(a). LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 2009-1372, 2009-1380, 2009-1416, 2009-1417, 2010- 1291