Post by coxatdotnet on Sept 4, 2012 20:24:03 GMT -5
What amazes me more than anything is the complete lack of leaks dating back to the WSJ articles during the first couple of weeks. My theory is that Gropper laid down the law...now I wish I had some information to back that assertion up as fact.
Post by coxatdotnet on Sept 4, 2012 20:28:27 GMT -5
20 interested parties...an average of at least 2-3 folks per party "in the know"...and not even anything from someone at a company or consortium who says something like "we aren't in the running"? Amazing.
At the end of the day, the negative leaks could end up working for our advantage since the expectations are so low at this point.
Agree again Coxa. It just would be alot easier to get to 1 or 2 or 3 bucks upon the announcement had the shares been on a steady climb up until the result. But expectations are very low so, assuming there is a sale any sale the stock will rise.