|
Post by Marriott on Sept 9, 2012 10:53:42 GMT -5
I am against voting to ban people from this board because it would tend to move people away from honesty and move towards uniformity .
Let the liars, cheaters and bashers voice their" opinions " . We are free to ignore them and move on.
In cases where people threaten to commit crimes ....etc the ADMIN should take immediate steps to ban and proceed further, if necessary.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 9, 2012 11:01:09 GMT -5
I too do not want to ban people.
That is control and censorship, and I don't want to play favorites.
I consider everyone here friends to me.
I feel as though there should be opposing views.
I think everyone Long or short, or basher should just make an account, and lets get into it in respectful honest discussions, regardless of what side you are on.
I made this place to be fun, and also to be a place where we can discuss everything without fear of being controlled.
The only thing we can NOT do here is post nude pics which I was reminded about the other day.
SBG
|
|
|
Post by Marriott on Sept 9, 2012 11:05:13 GMT -5
" Do not argue with an idiot! He will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience! "
ADMIN : great advice !
|
|
|
Post by newyorkled2008 on Sept 9, 2012 11:07:05 GMT -5
I agree folks to an extent.
If someone is going way overboard by refusing to stop posting inane posts amounting to nothing or as you say Marriott, threaten to do unacceptable things then they Should be banned.
Mind you, I made mention yesterday of Kid's posting as a guest only as an example. AND, if ever that sort of poll takes place again, one should consider that such a decision should be based on the bulk of the members opinions and not merely a handful or one single person (as in a democracy).
Btw, SBG, is there the option of ignoring someone?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 9, 2012 11:13:32 GMT -5
No ignore NY
SBG
|
|
|
Post by proforkodak on Sept 9, 2012 12:09:06 GMT -5
Its about the FACTS versus somebody who DELIBERATELY or canNOT deal with them.
How long do WE allow people to continually post LIES?
I have broken down the various ASSETS of Kodak, and what liabilities must be satisfied, and which are NOT legal claims that must be satisfied.
How many posts do we allow from someone who REFUSES to deal with basic ANALYSIS?
This MB can be run like a SCIENTIFIC group, or a group of religious FREAKS.
Scientific groups do NOT allow morons to PUBLISH to LIES.
Are YOU folks interested in the FACTS, or opinions of LIARS?
How many POSTS are allowed by people who are either too STUPID to understand the FACTS, and/or are DELIBERATELY posting/publishing LIES?
I can ASSURE you that SCIENTISTS would NOT allow some Dipwad to constantly disrupt one of their on line discussion groups.
UNLESS the "dipwad" can post FACTS or analysis that supports their claims, INTELLIGENT people will NOT want their discussions constantly disrupted by a LIAR.
|
|
|
Post by Marriott on Sept 9, 2012 12:30:55 GMT -5
" Its about the FACTS versus somebody who DELIBERATELY or canNOT deal with them. "
pro:
The passion in which you state your positions is to be applauded.
Fact: A new child is born today. - You may choose to see the child as a new life gracing this earth with unlimited possibilities. I may see the child as just another mouth to feed and someone else to make a carbon footprint.
What meaning each of gives to " the facts ' is what will continue to make this board interesting and attract additional members.
|
|