|
Post by forkodak on Feb 20, 2014 11:41:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by julgob on Feb 20, 2014 11:50:31 GMT -5
which means what ?!? anyways
|
|
|
Post by forkodak on Feb 20, 2014 11:55:15 GMT -5
Not sure; could add more conjecture but not sure that is a good idea... What do you think?
On another note I am not sure what I should do about my taxes; I think I will wait and take the losses when I file in 2015 for 2014... Will have to ask my tax guy when it comes to that I guess....
|
|
|
Post by We Got Hosed!!! on Feb 24, 2014 7:56:39 GMT -5
which means what ?!? anyways means MORE time to work on the buyout little buddy.. needed more time to hammer out the details and everyone here including ROBOT will be a big winner.
|
|
|
Post by forkodak on Feb 25, 2014 10:15:13 GMT -5
which means what ?!? anyways means MORE time to work on the buyout little buddy.. needed more time to hammer out the details and everyone here including ROBOT will be a big winner. I doubt there will be a buyout, I thinking there will be a second shelf on old shares to save tax assets then Kodak will acquire assets that make money with cash from second shelf...
|
|
|
Post by We Got Hosed!!! on Feb 26, 2014 9:27:52 GMT -5
second shelf on old shares?
What do you mean?
|
|
|
Post by forkodak on Feb 26, 2014 15:24:23 GMT -5
To be clear not Pro and not a pro but;
Vermillion used a second shelf to raise money while in bankrupcy allowing it to exit and restate shares.
from memory they sold 1.8 million shares at ~18 bucks a share to raise money and exited bankrupcy in Januany of 2010 with something like 9 million outstanding shares.
In our case there would have to be change to the plan based on an outside investor wanting to invest money in Kodak; they would use the old shares since the tax assets reside in those shares...
|
|
|
Post by updated on Feb 27, 2014 1:59:35 GMT -5
Guys, you know I will all of us the best but I don't foken trust anything KODAK anymore... You guys are crazy to think we will get a dime out of Kodak ... but you know... you never know To be clear not Pro and not a pro but; Vermillion used a second shelf to raise money while in bankrupcy allowing it to exit and restate shares. from memory they sold 1.8 million shares at ~18 bucks a share to raise money and exited bankrupcy in Januany of 2010 with something like 9 million outstanding shares. In our case there would have to be change to the plan based on an outside investor wanting to invest money in Kodak; they would use the old shares since the tax assets reside in those shares...
|
|
|
Post by forkodak on Feb 27, 2014 10:21:34 GMT -5
Guys, you know I will all of us the best but I don't foken trust anything KODAK anymore... You guys are crazy to think we will get a dime out of Kodak ... but you know... you never know To be clear not Pro and not a pro but; Vermillion used a second shelf to raise money while in bankrupcy allowing it to exit and restate shares. from memory they sold 1.8 million shares at ~18 bucks a share to raise money and exited bankrupcy in Januany of 2010 with something like 9 million outstanding shares. In our case there would have to be change to the plan based on an outside investor wanting to invest money in Kodak; they would use the old shares since the tax assets reside in those shares... Kodak does not have the money to invest; if things work for the old shareholders it will be from new money from outside Kodak; this new money sees value in the tax assets and have a business plan from this new Kodak...
|
|